<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Innovationpartners</title>
	<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk</link>
	<description>A weblog about IP and innovation</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Interesting Indian decision on music royalties</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=716</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=716#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Copyright</category>

		<category>World</category>

		<category>Court</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=716</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t read many Indian IP decisions but when I read this one on Spicy IP I was fascinated.
In short the Copyright Board has set the royalty rate of playing music on the radio in India to 2% of the net advertisement earnings of each FM radio station.
The FM station had complained about the very [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=716</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lack of protection the source of German success?</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=715</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=715#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Copyright</category>

		<category>Europe</category>

		<category>Innovation</category>

		<category>Research</category>

		<category>Books</category>

		<category>Politics</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A German researcher, Eckhard Höffner, has written a book on early copyright history and the effects of protection in Germany. 
In his book Höffner claim that a climate of non-copyright protection in Germany stimulated the distribution of knowledge and book market. He compares the situation to the British book market, where there was a more strict [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=715</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trademarks that make you happy!</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=714</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=714#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 20:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Trademarks</category>

		<category>World</category>

		<category>Branding</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On Pink Tentacle I found this post on cute Japanese trademarked characters. Those Japanese marketing guys really work hard to produce some serious cuteness.



]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=714</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To stand on the shoulders of giants you need …giants.</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=713</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=713#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Innovation</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read a July column from the Guardian threatening to lure the readers into beliving that copying is the new innovation. In the column Oliver Burkemann argue that the fact that there are numerous examples of “copycats” being more successful than the originals show that it pays to be a copycat. He uses Ipod and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=713</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shift towards IP based value</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=712</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=712#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2010 13:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Europe</category>

		<category>Strategy</category>

		<category>General IP</category>

		<category>Economy</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the latest issue of the UK IPO´s newsletter there is an article about the shift between bricks and mortar value of businesses towards value originating in intangible assets. 
 
The article nicely supports my own findings when analyzing Danish companies and their value. 
 
In the article the author suggests that investors take the shift into consideration when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=712</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent trolling is bad business…for the trolls</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=711</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=711#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Patent</category>

		<category>Strategy</category>

		<category>USA</category>

		<category>Economy</category>

		<category>Management</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=711</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Via a mention on Tech Crunch I found a listing on the returns of investments done by an investment company. Among the companies the fund invested in is Intellectual Ventures…a well known patent troll. The calculations show that rate of return of the funds invested in Intellectual Ventures is negative. Actually the return is -73% [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=711</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=710</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=710#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 11:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Copyright</category>

		<category>Court</category>

		<category>USA</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bratz scores a hit on Barbie
Even if the Bratz craze has subsided to a level where the strange dolls are only found in toy bins in the fleamarket the fight over the rights to the dolls still rage.
A few years ago a US court awarded the ownership of the Bratz product line to Mattel. The [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=710</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Software copyright case</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=709</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=709#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Software</category>

		<category>Copyright</category>

		<category>Europe</category>

		<category>Court</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is not often these days that you get a chance to read up on basic software copyright. It is usually all about patents these days. Via the 1709 blog however I found this new judgement that lays it all out.
 
The case SAS institute vs. World Programming Ltd. Is about:
 i  ) A claim that WPL [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=709</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who is ahead in wind power market?</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=705</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=705#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 09:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>Patent</category>

		<category>World</category>

		<category>Innovation</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In today’s Berlingske (Danish Newspaper) there is a story about how Danish Windmill company Vestas will be hard pressed the coming years as the Asian tigers get more competitive.  Being in the power/energy business I decided to see it in a patent perspective. I researched the number of patents published from 2007 – 2009 relating [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=705</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New IP enforcement plan from US</title>
		<link>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=704</link>
		<comments>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=704#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Beyer</dc:creator>
		
		<category>USA</category>

		<category>General IP</category>

		<category>IP Piracy</category>

		<category>Politics</category>

		<category>Authority</category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?p=704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During the summer I missed the launch of the first US intellectual property enforcement strategy, by the U.S. Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator. Back from my holiday I read the 65 page strategy and found several interesting items. The strategy is divided in 6 different categories
(1) Leading by example
(2) Increasing transparency
(3) Ensuring efficiency and coordination
(4) Enforcing our [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.innovationpartners.dk/?feed=rss2&amp;p=704</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
